The Public's Interpretation of Scientific Consensus

This abstract has open access
Abstract Summary

Matthew Slater (Bucknell University), Joanna Huxster (Eckerd College)

It is well known that large segments of the American lay public do not see anthropogenic climate change (ACC) as a serious risk. Recent social scientific research on climate change communication has suggested that acceptance that there is a scientific consensus about ACC may serve as a "gateway belief" for more accurate belief about its existence and risks. We argue that such messages only gain their permanence and utility in a context of an understanding of the social structure of science that makes the epistemic significance of scientific consensus understandable. How best should we convey such an understanding?

Abstract ID :
NKDR252
Abstract Topics

Associated Sessions

Eckerd College
Bucknell University
165 visits