• Home
  • Registration
  • Program
    • Meeting Program
    • Special Events
      • President’s Plenary Symposium
      • PSA2018 Public Forum
      • Meet the Editor: Inside the Journal Philosophy of Science
      • Awards Ceremony & Presidential Address
      • PSA2018 Post-Meeting Workshop
    • Other Events
      • Women’s Caucus Lunch
      • JCSEPHS Social Engagement Showcase
      • Interest Group Lunches
      • NSF Sessions
    • Receptions
    • Program Committees
    • Philsci Archive Preprint Volume
    • Program at a Glance
  • Information for Attendees
    • Travel Grants
    • Travel and Accommodations
      • Traveling to Seattle
      • Accommodations
      • Restaurants
      • Attractions
      • Getting Around Seattle
    • Dependent Care
    • Presenters and Chairs
      • Instructions for Posters
      • Instructions for Presenters
      • Volunteer to Chair a Session
      • Instructions for Chairs
    • Speakers and Attendees
      • Attendees
      • Speakers
    • Website User Guide
    • Registration Desk Hours
  • Forums
    • Discussion Board
    • 50th Anniversary Blog
    • PSA Social Media Policy
  • More
    • Exhibit
      • Contact an Exhibitor
      • Exhibitors
      • Exhibitor Registration
      • Book Exhibit Floor Plan and Hours
      • Information for Publishers
    • Sponsors
      • PSA2018 Sponsors
      • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Donate
    • Join
      • Join the PSA Listserv
      • Join the PSA
      • Check Your Membership Status
    • Contact
      • Terms and Conditions
  • Login
Site Logo Image
PSA2018: The 26th Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association
Site Logo Image
PSA2018: The 26th Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association
  • Login
  • Home
  • Registration
  • Program
    • Meeting Program
    • Special Events
      • President’s Plenary Symposium
      • PSA2018 Public Forum
      • Meet the Editor: Inside the Journal Philosophy of Science
      • Awards Ceremony & Presidential Address
      • PSA2018 Post-Meeting Workshop
    • Other Events
      • Women’s Caucus Lunch
      • JCSEPHS Social Engagement Showcase
      • Interest Group Lunches
      • NSF Sessions
    • Receptions
    • Program Committees
    • Philsci Archive Preprint Volume
    • Program at a Glance
  • Information for Attendees
    • Travel Grants
    • Travel and Accommodations
      • Traveling to Seattle
      • Accommodations
      • Restaurants
      • Attractions
      • Getting Around Seattle
    • Dependent Care
    • Presenters and Chairs
      • Instructions for Posters
      • Instructions for Presenters
      • Volunteer to Chair a Session
      • Instructions for Chairs
    • Speakers and Attendees
      • Attendees
      • Speakers
    • Website User Guide
    • Registration Desk Hours
  • Forums
    • Discussion Board
    • 50th Anniversary Blog
    • PSA Social Media Policy
  • More
    • Exhibit
      • Contact an Exhibitor
      • Exhibitors
      • Exhibitor Registration
      • Book Exhibit Floor Plan and Hours
      • Information for Publishers
    • Sponsors
      • PSA2018 Sponsors
      • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Donate
    • Join
      • Join the PSA Listserv
      • Join the PSA
      • Check Your Membership Status
    • Contact
      • Terms and Conditions
Site Logo Image
PSA2018: The 26th Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association
  • Login

Idealisation, Abstraction, and (Mis)representation

NKDR882

James Nguyen (University of Notre Dame) It is commonly assumed that idealised models misrepresent their target systems. And as such the role(s) of idealisations in science seem mysterious: how can misrepresentations accurately predict, explain, or generate understanding about, target system behaviou...

Philosophy of Science
James Nguyen

Imagination in Art and Science

NKDR182

Steven French (University of Leeds) Are the nature and role of imagination in science the same as that in art? Here I explore this question in the context of scientific discovery. On the one hand, contrary to recent accounts of imagination in fiction, the relevant attitude in science seems closer to...

Philosophy of Science
Steven French

Imprecisely Chancy Evolution

NKDR832

Marshall Abrams (University of Alabama, Birmingham) I argue that biological evolution and other complex processes depend on imprecise chances, i.e. imprecise analogues of real-valued objective probabilities. I give a general argument for the existence of imprecise chances in nature. I then argue tha...

Philosophy of Science
Marshall Abrams

In Praise of ... Engineering??

NKDR622

John Bickle (Mississippi State University) Tool development in contemporary neurobiology exemplifies Hacking's insistence that experiment has a "life of its own" independent of theory. Previously Bickle argued for this using the development of gene targeting techniques and optogenetics/DREADDs. Here...

Philosophy of Science
John Bickle

Individuating Cultures: Two Answers to the Problem of Units and Differences

NKDR31367

Andrew Buskell (University of Cambridge) - Empirical approaches across the natural and social sciences assume well-individuated cultures; that is, that cultures are individuals that differ in key features. Cultural anthropologists, for instance, highlight kin structure, marriage customs, means of ex...

Philosophy of Science
Andrew Buskell

Inequality and Inequity in the Emergence of Norms

NKDR992

Calvin Cochran (University of California, Irvine), Cailin O'Connor (University of California, Irvine) Many societies have state norms of equity---that those who make symmetric social contributions deserve symmetric rewards. Despite this, there are widespread patterns of social inequity, especially a...

Philosophy of Science
Calvin Cochran

Inferential Power, Formalisms, and Scientific Models

NKDR582

Vincent Ardourel (KU Leuven), Anouk Barberousse (Paris Sorbonne Université), Cyrille Imbert (CNRS) Scientific models need to be investigated if they are to provide valuable information about the systems they represent. Surprisingly, the epistemological question of what enables this investigation ha...

Philosophy of Science
Mr. Vincent Ardourel

Interpreting Dualities

NKDR712

Sebastian De Haro (University of Amsterdam), Jeremy Butterfield (University of Cambridge) We have elsewhere advocated a schema for understanding dualities, both in string theory and other fields of physics. In this talk, we use it to address how duality relates to logical equivalence, intertranslata...

Philosophy of Science
Jeremy Butterfield

Is Peer Review a Good Idea?

NKDR282

Remco Heesen (University of Cambridge), Liam Kofi Bright (Carnegie Mellon University) Pre-publication peer review should be abolished. We consider the effects that such a change will have on the social structure of science, paying particular attention to the changed incentive structure and the likel...

Philosophy of Science
Liam Bright

Knowledge: Individually Responsible, Collectively Justified

NKDR722

Boaz Miller (Zefat Academic College) While philosophers of science formulate conditions for communal knowledge, they say little about when an individual member of an epistemic community knows. I argue that an individual member knows when she responsibly does what is practicably possible to have a tr...

Philosophy of Science
Boaz Miller

Idealization and Many Aims

NKDR782

Angela Potochnik (University of Cincinnati) I motivate the idea that scientific understanding is often directly benefited from the inclusion of false posits, i.e. idealizations. This is because researchers' specific aims influence what generates the cognitive state of understanding. Accordingly, gen...

Philosophy of Science
Angela Potochnik

Implicit Bias: Recent Criticism and Responses

NKDR66400

Michael Brownstein (John Jay College) - What is the status of research on implicit bias? Criticism is ubiquitous. Recent meta-analytic reviews suggest that the Implicit Association Test is a “poor” predictor of behavior (Oswald et al. 2013) and that changes in scores on implicit measures may not...

Philosophy of Science
Michael Brownstein

Improving Scientific Rigor

NKDR722

Ferric Fang (University of Washington) Research reproducibility is increasingly questioned. Explosive growth of the literature and hypercompetition among scientists are not conducive to good scientific practices. Proposals to make research more reproducible emphasize scientific rigor with little gui...

Philosophy of Science
Ferric Fang

Indigenising the Retreat of Race Science: Alfred Métraux and the Polynesian ...

NKDR61369

Sebastián Gil-Riaño (University of Pennsylvania) - Shortly after the publication of the 1950 UNESCO Statement on Race, UNESCO appointed Alfred Métraux, a Swiss-American anthropologist, to become director of its "race division" and lead its international anti-racism campaign. Among anthropologists...

Philosophy of Science
Sebastián Gil-Riaño

Individuating Genes as Types or Individuals

NKDR482

Ruey-Lin Chen (National Chung Cheng University) "What is a gene?" is an important philosophical question that has been asked over and over. This paper approaches this question by understanding it as the individuation problem of genes, because it implies the problem of identifying genes and identifyi...

Philosophy of Science
Ruey-Lin Chen

Inertial Motion in Teleparallel Gravity and Newtonian Gravitation Theory

NKDR142

James Read (University of Oxford) The goal of this paper is to pinpoint the precise reasons for the differing status of inertial motion in TPG versus NG. In so doing, I seek to bring greater clarity to the notion of inertial motion in physical theories more generally. Along the way, I discuss Knox's...

Philosophy of Science
James Read

Institutions and Scientific Progress

NKDR652

Chrysostomos Mantzavinos (University of Athens) Scientific progress has many facets and can be conceptualized in different ways, for example in terms of problem-solving, of truhtlikeness or of growth of knowledge. The main claim of the paper is that the most important prerequisite of scientific prog...

Philosophy of Science
Prof. Chrysostomos Mantzavinos

Interventionism and the Challenge of Psychological Causation

NKDR652

Markus Eronen (University of Groningen) In this paper, I will argue that interventionist causal discovery faces great obstacles in psychology, due to the special subject matter of psychology (i.e., human individuals and their minds/brains). First, psychological interventions are likely to be both fa...

Philosophy of Science
Markus Eronen

It's My Model and I'll Represent if I Want To

NKDR762

Joshua Luczak (Leibniz Universität Hannover) Much of the literature on modelling in science is concerned with representational models. Despite their importance, distinct nature, and presence, toy models, on the other hand, which are a kind of nonrepresentational model, are rarely discussed. This pa...

Philosophy of Science
Joshua Luczak

Laws, Metaphysical Explanation and Quantum Ontology

NKDR64391

Nina Emery (Mount Holyoke College) - In this paper, I argue that laws metaphysically explain their instances, and show how this argument has implications for the debate over quantum ontology. I begin by revisiting an argument for the view that laws ground their instances that was originally presente...

Philosophy of Science
Nina Emery

Identifying Causes in Psychiatry

NKDR242

Lena Kästner (Ruhr-University Bochum) Explanations in psychiatry often integrate various factors relevant to psychopathology. Identifying genuine causes among them is theoretically and clinically important, but epistemically challenging. Woodward’s interventionism appears to provide a promising t...

Philosophy of Science
Lena Kästner

Imprecise Chance and Chance-Credence Coordination

NKDR832

Luke Fenton-Glynn (University College London) The notion that imprecise *credences* are rationally permissible or even mandatory has gained increasing attention. Less well known is that there are powerful arguments that *chances* are sometimes imprecise. I propose a specific principle for how ration...

Philosophy of Science
Luke Fenton-Glynn

In Defense of Alternative Facts

NKDR85405

Julian Reiss (Durham University) - The main claim I am making in this paper is that there are few if any uncontroversial facts in economics. I provide three reasons to back up this claim. First, fact/value entanglement is pernicious in economics. Second, socio-economic facts tend to be sensitive to ...

Philosophy of Science
Prof. Julian Reiss

Indigenous/Science: Building Partnership Projects on Indigenous Histories and...

NKDR452

Alison Wylie (University of British Columbia) I compare the trajectory of three different projects that are using the tools of archaeological science — geochemical, DNA, stable isotope, and survey analysis — to address Indigenous-led questions in the context of an Indigenous/Science re...

Philosophy of Science
Alison Wylie

Inductive vs. Deductive Statistical Inference

NKDR702

Konstantin Genin (University of Toronto), Kevin T. Kelly (Carnegie Mellon University) The distinction between deductive (infallible, monotonic) and inductive (fallible, non-monotonic) inference is fundamental in the philosophy of science. However, virtually all scientific inference is statistical, w...

Philosophy of Science
Konstantin Genin

Inference to the Best Explanation and Mathematical Explanation

NKDR572

Alex Koo (University of Toronto) The Enhanced Indispensability Argument (EIA) for mathematical realism supposedly represents an improvement over its Quinean predecessor due to the replacement of confirmational holism with Inference to the Best Explanation (IBE) to infer realism. The assumption is th...

Philosophy of Science
Alex Koo

Integrating in the Face of Contradiction: Lessons from Cosmology

NKDR192

Siska De Baerdemaeker (University of Pittsburgh) Cosmology at its core is an integrative science. In this paper, I focus on evidential integration and I investigate how cosmologists can overcome diffculties in integrating different sources of evidence. I draw a distinction between mediated and unmed...

Philosophy of Science
Siska De Baerdemaeker

Interventionist Mental Causation and the Methods of Cognitive Neuroscience

NKDR552

Mario Guenther (Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy) We impose properties of causation, as assumed in cognitive neuroscience, upon Woodward's (2005, 2015) account of interventionism. Within the resulting framework, we investigate to what extent we are justified to derive causal relations betwe...

Philosophy of Science
Mario Guenther

Kant, Linnaeus, and the Economy of Nature

NKDR322

Aaron Wells (University of Notre Dame) Recent scholarship has highlighted Kant's contributions to debates in the life sciences, but comparatively little attention has been paid to his engagement with Linnaeus's 'Economy of Nature' program. As this paper explores, Kant argues that there is no need, e...

Philosophy of Science
Aaron Wells

Learning Through the Scientific Imagination

NKDR602

Fiora Salis (University of York) How do we learn through the scientific imagination involved in scientific models? I distinguish between two sorts of claims scientists can make within the modelling practice, claims about the imaginary system the model describes and claims about reality. The former r...

Philosophy of Science
Fiora Salis
Display #
  • Prev
  • Next
Page 10 of 18
Forgot your Password?
Site Logo Image
PSA2018: The 26th Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association

Dryfta Logo Dryfta event tools for academia & non-profits

We use cookies on this website to enhance your user experience.