Loading Session...

Community Science as Democratic Science

Session Information

Community Science is a type of citizen science co-developed and co-executed by professional and non-professional scientists. Because of this deeper and more intimate involvement of ordinary individuals in the scientific process, Community Science projects are said to have a greater potential than the other three types to build successful partnerships and to engender an understanding of the nature of science. This symposium represents a first systematic philosophical exploration of this practice, asking whether such projects live up to their rhetoric of addressing epistemic and material injustice. The papers consider the extent to which community science can form the basis of a practice of reconciliation in oppressed, minority communities, whether citizen participants are exploited by professional scientists, and if community science has the educational and epistemic potential it is claimed to have.

03 Nov 2018 03:45 PM - 05:45 PM(America/Los_Angeles)
Venue : Issaquah A (Third Floor)
20181103T1545 20181103T1745 America/Los_Angeles Community Science as Democratic Science

Community Science is a type of citizen science co-developed and co-executed by professional and non-professional scientists. Because of this deeper and more intimate involvement of ordinary individuals in the scientific process, Community Science projects are said to have a greater potential than the other three types to build successful partnerships and to engender an understanding of the nature of science. This symposium represents a first systematic philosophical exploration of this practice, asking whether such projects live up to their rhetoric of addressing epistemic and material injustice. The papers consider the extent to which community science can form the basis of a practice of reconciliation in oppressed, minority communities, whether citizen participants are exploited by professional scientists, and if community science has the educational and epistemic potential it is claimed to have.

Issaquah A (Third Floor) PSA2018: The 26th Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association office@philsci.org

Presentations

Indigenous/Science: Building Partnership Projects on Indigenous Histories and Landscape Use

Philosophy of Science 03:45 PM - 04:25 PM (America/Los_Angeles) 2018/11/03 22:45:00 UTC - 2018/11/03 23:25:00 UTC
Alison Wylie (University of British Columbia)
I compare the trajectory of three different projects that are using the tools of archaeological science — geochemical, DNA, stable isotope, and survey analysis — to address Indigenous-led questions in the context of an Indigenous/Science research cluster taking shape at UBC. These are designed to build partnerships that embody a "practice of reconciliation," and require the cultivation of translational expertise on the part of all partners. I identify points of divergence in the epistemic norms and goals that partners bring to these projects with the aim of delineating strategies for productively engaging these differences.
Presenters Alison Wylie
University Of British Columbia

Flint, Michigan, Environmental Justice, and the Potential Exploitation of Citizen Scientists

Philosophy of Science 04:25 PM - 05:05 PM (America/Los_Angeles) 2018/11/03 23:25:00 UTC - 2018/11/04 00:05:00 UTC
Jonathan Rosenberg (University of Washington, Seattle)
The Flint Water Study shows that collaborations between communities facing environmental injustice and scientists/engineers are prone to unintentional, mutually-beneficial, exploitation of their non-scientific participants. The non-scientist participant communities are vulnerable, in virtue of past and ongoing social and economic injustices, as well as the ongoing acute environmental crises that those injustices have helped produce. Further, the collaboration between the scientists and non-scientists participants may be unfair, because the benefits of the collaboration do not accrue proportionally to both parties. Thus, despite consent and good will on both sides, these projects may involve the exploitation of their citizen participants.
Presenters
JR
Jonathan Rosenberg
University Of Washington, Seattle

Save the Sea Lion: Community Science in the Galápagos Archipelago

Philosophy of Science 05:05 PM - 05:45 PM (America/Los_Angeles) 2018/11/04 00:05:00 UTC - 2018/11/04 00:45:00 UTC
Michael Weisberg (University of Pennsylvania), Deena Weisberg (University of Pennsylvania)
Galapagueños, the full-time residents of the Galápagos Archipelago, are simultaneously the source of the greatest stress on the islands and potentially their most effective protectors. But there is a deep disconnect between their daily lives and the conservation priorities of the National Park. To help address this disconnect we have piloted a community science initiative based on San Cristóbal Island and focused on endangered Galápagos Sea Lions. We argue that despite the real difficulties of conducting science in this manner, community science can be an excellent way to increase trust in the scientific community and the importance of conservation measures.
Presenters
DW
Deena Weisberg
University Of Pennsylvania
MW
Michael Weisberg
University Of Pennsylvania
870 visits

Session Participants

User Online
Session speakers, moderators & attendees
University of British Columbia
University of Washington, Seattle
University of Pennsylvania
University of Pennsylvania
University of Notre Dame
No attendee has checked-in to this session!
51 attendees saved this session

Session Chat

Live Chat
Chat with participants attending this session

Questions & Answers

Answered
Submit questions for the presenters

Session Polls

Active
Participate in live polls

Need Help?

Technical Issues?

If you're experiencing playback problems, try adjusting the quality or refreshing the page.

Questions for Speakers?

Use the Q&A tab to submit questions that may be addressed in follow-up sessions.