Loading Session...

Case Study Research in the Social Sciences

Session Information

Case study research is one of the most important research approaches in the social sciences. However, it has received very little attention from philosophers of science. The proposed symposium aims to initiate a philosophical debate about case study research by focusing on three salient philosophical themes in the social scientific debates about case study research. The papers by Julie Zahle and Sharon Crasnow will address the issue of evidence integration in case study research, the paper by Rosa Runhardt will discuss the justification of explanatory claims, and the papers by Attilia Ruzzene and Petri Ylikoski will focus on the problem of generalization from case studies. Together these five papers aim to demonstrate that case study research is philosophical interesting and that the reflection on case study research has implications also for philosophical methodology.

04 Nov 2018 09:00 AM - 11:45 AM(America/Los_Angeles)
Venue : Issaquah A (Third Floor)
20181104T0900 20181104T1145 America/Los_Angeles Case Study Research in the Social Sciences

Case study research is one of the most important research approaches in the social sciences. However, it has received very little attention from philosophers of science. The proposed symposium aims to initiate a philosophical debate about case study research by focusing on three salient philosophical themes in the social scientific debates about case study research. The papers by Julie Zahle and Sharon Crasnow will address the issue of evidence integration in case study research, the paper by Rosa Runhardt will discuss the justification of explanatory claims, and the papers by Attilia Ruzzene and Petri Ylikoski will focus on the problem of generalization from case studies. Together these five papers aim to demonstrate that case study research is philosophical interesting and that the reflection on case study research has implications also for philosophical methodology.

Issaquah A (Third Floor) PSA2018: The 26th Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association office@philsci.org

Presentations

Epistemic Values and Multiple Methods in Case Study Research

Philosophy of Science 09:00 AM - 09:30 AM (America/Los_Angeles) 2018/11/04 17:00:00 UTC - 2018/11/04 17:30:00 UTC
Julie Zahle (University of Bergen)
Case Study research is characterized by the employment of multiple data gathering methods. In this paper, I examine the concurrent use of participant observation and qualitative interviews. The question I address is: what is the rationale behind their combination in case study research? The two most common rationales appeal to completeness and convergence respectively. I point to a third significant way to motivate their joint use: it allows the generation of complementary evidence that puts the researcher in a better position to confirm that her data set manifests central epistemic values. I refer to this as blended epistemic value validation.
Presenters
JZ
Julie Zahle
University Of Bergen

Causal Scenarios and Causal Mechanisms Schemes in Case Studies

Philosophy of Science 09:30 AM - 10:00 AM (America/Los_Angeles) 2018/11/04 17:30:00 UTC - 2018/11/04 18:00:00 UTC
Petri Ylikoski (University of Helsinki)
Recent literature on case study research suggests a connection between generalization from case studies and mechanism-based theorising. The social scientists employ the notion of mechanism in two different contexts: explaining particular causal outcomes and in developing theories about social mechanisms. This paper argues that the role of concept of mechanism is different in these uses and that it is useful to distinguish between causal scenarios and causal mechanism schemes.
Presenters
PY
Petri Ylikoski
University Of Helsinki

Cases, Causes, and Counterfactuals in Social Science

Philosophy of Science 10:15 AM - 10:45 AM (America/Los_Angeles) 2018/11/04 18:15:00 UTC - 2018/11/04 18:45:00 UTC
Sharon Crasnow (Norco College)
Within-case counterfactual analysis requires detailed, concrete knowledge in order to determine which potential causal factors can be varied legitimately — i.e., what counterfactuals are possible. The detail-orientation of such research is in tension with the generality and abstraction of population-based methods (large-N observational or experimental). Such tension makes simple aggregation of evidence problematic. However which counterfactual scenarios are possible also depends on theoretical assumptions and empirically supported regularities — claims supported through population-based research designs. Thus an examination of counterfactual analysis in case study research suggests that the strength of mixed methods research requires a holistic understanding of evidence.
Presenters Sharon Crasnow
Norco College
683 visits

Session Participants

User Online
Session speakers, moderators & attendees
University of Helsinki
University of Bergen
Norco College
University of California, Davis and London School of Economics
No attendee has checked-in to this session!
22 attendees saved this session

Session Chat

Live Chat
Chat with participants attending this session

Questions & Answers

Answered
Submit questions for the presenters

Session Polls

Active
Participate in live polls

Need Help?

Technical Issues?

If you're experiencing playback problems, try adjusting the quality or refreshing the page.

Questions for Speakers?

Use the Q&A tab to submit questions that may be addressed in follow-up sessions.