Loading Session...

Explanation, Universality, and Renormalization Across the Sciences

Session Information

The renormalization group (RG) provides an explanation of universality across a range of heterogeneous physical systems; e.g. fluids and magnets. Given their importance to debates concerning explanation and reduction, several philosophers have analyzed the distinctive features of RG methods and their use of the thermodynamic limit to explain universality (Batterman 2002, 2010; Butterfield 2011; Morrison 2015; Reutlinger 2014). While this literature has produced important insights, it has typically focused exclusively on applications of RG within physics. Recently, however, there has been growing attention paid to applications of renormalization, universality, and limiting behaviors in other fields; e.g. in econophysics, chemistry, and biology. In addition, there have been various attempts to incorporate RG explanations into more general accounts of scientific explanation that apply across several sciences (Batterman and Rice 2014; Rice 2013; Reutlinger 2016). This symposium will investigate the use of RG explanations, universality, and limits across a range of scientific disciplines. Determining whether these concepts can be fruitfully exported to cases outside of physics — and perhaps incorporated into more general accounts of explanation and idealization — will expand the discussion of RG explanations into contemporary debates in philosophy of economics, philosophy of biology, philosophy of chemistry, and general philosophy of science.

04 Nov 2018 09:00 AM - 11:45 AM(America/Los_Angeles)
Venue : University (Fourth Floor Union Street Tower)
20181104T0900 20181104T1145 America/Los_Angeles Explanation, Universality, and Renormalization Across the Sciences

The renormalization group (RG) provides an explanation of universality across a range of heterogeneous physical systems; e.g. fluids and magnets. Given their importance to debates concerning explanation and reduction, several philosophers have analyzed the distinctive features of RG methods and their use of the thermodynamic limit to explain universality (Batterman 2002, 2010; Butterfield 2011; Morrison 2015; Reutlinger 2014). While this literature has produced important insights, it has typically focused exclusively on applications of RG within physics. Recently, however, there has been growing attention paid to applications of renormalization, universality, and limiting behaviors in other fields; e.g. in econophysics, chemistry, and biology. In addition, there have been various attempts to incorporate RG explanations into more general accounts of scientific explanation that apply across several sciences (Batterman and Rice 2014; Rice 2013; Reutlinger 2016). This symposium will investigate the use of RG explanations, universality, and limits across a range of scientific disciplines. Determining whether these concepts can be fruitfully exported to cases outside of physics — and perhaps incorporated into more general accounts of explanation and idealization — will expand the discussion of RG explanations into contemporary debates in philosophy of economics, philosophy of biology, philosophy of chemistry, and general philosophy of science.

University (Fourth Floor Union Street Tower) PSA2018: The 26th Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association office@philsci.org

Presentations

Explaining Universality

Philosophy of Science 09:00 AM - 09:30 AM (America/Los_Angeles) 2018/11/04 17:00:00 UTC - 2018/11/04 17:30:00 UTC
Robert Batterman (University of Pittsburgh)
I will provide a definition of the concept of universality that goes beyond the simple "same/similar behavior by different systems" meme. The key feature of universality is a claim about the stability of an upper scale behavior under perturbation of lower scale structures. I will discuss some ways understanding of universal behavior through modeling of inactive materials such as, fluids, gases, and even steel beams. I will also consider universality in active materials such as the cytoskeleton. The important difference between inactive and active materials concerns the fact that active systems are out of equilibrium whose components transduce energy.
Presenters
RB
Robert Batterman
University Of Pittsburgh

Critical Phenomena (and Financial Crises)

Philosophy of Science 09:30 AM - 10:00 AM (America/Los_Angeles) 2018/11/04 17:30:00 UTC - 2018/11/04 18:00:00 UTC
Jennifer Jhun (Lake Forest College)
We explore the explanatory upshot of supplementing traditional economics with econophysics models by investigating more contemporary models that are popular among economists. Two popular contemporary approaches to modeling in macroeconomics are: dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) methods and computational agent-based modeling (ABM) methods – the latter which include econophysics models. We argue that they are explanatorily different, but that a pluralist attitude can help us unite the two kinds of approaches, i.e. equilibrium reasoning can be fruitfully united with reasoning about critical behavior that lends itself to phenomena like financial crises.
Presenters
JJ
Jennifer Jhun
Lake Forest College

The Quest for Universal Biology

Philosophy of Science 10:15 AM - 10:45 AM (America/Los_Angeles) 2018/11/04 18:15:00 UTC - 2018/11/04 18:45:00 UTC
Christopher Pincock (Ohio State University)
There have been several attempts to make sense of the necessary features of life, not only as it happens to be on Earth, but as it must be anywhere it arises. These attempts seek some kind of "universal biology" that sometimes make links to universality explanations in physics. This paper considers one recent instance of this physics-inspired universal biology that aims to make sense of the genetic code (Goldenfeld, Biancalani and Jafarpour 2017). This case is used to support more general conclusions about the nature of explanations of universality.
Presenters
CP
Christopher Pincock
Ohio State University

Nucleation as Universal Behavior

Philosophy of Science 10:45 AM - 11:15 AM (America/Los_Angeles) 2018/11/04 18:45:00 UTC - 2018/11/04 19:15:00 UTC
Julia Bursetn (University of Kentucky)
I investigate nucleation as an example of universal behavior observable across a wide variety of physical and chemical processes. Nucleation produces phase transitions, including but not limited to those that the renormalization group models. Across the physical, chemical, and material sciences, nucleation dynamics are used to model changes in physical phase, but also the dynamics of many chemical reactions and even the formation and propagation of cracks in engineering materials. I will argue that the role of nucleation dynamics in modeling and explaining these varied processes exemplifies the pattern of explanation characteristic of universal behaviors.
Presenters
JB
Julia Bursten
University Of Kentucky

Universality and Modeling Limiting Behaviors

Philosophy of Science 11:15 AM - 11:45 AM (America/Los_Angeles) 2018/11/04 19:15:00 UTC - 2018/11/04 19:45:00 UTC
Collin Rice (Bryn Mawr College)
Biological modelers have recently started to explicitly appeal to universality classes in order to justify their use of highly idealized computational models to investigate limiting behaviors. For example, these modelers justify their use of a very simple Eden growth model by showing that their idealized model and the actual bacterial growth processes whose limiting behaviors they are interested in are both in the KPZ universality class. I argue that these cases show that the concepts of universality and stable limiting behaviors can be expanded beyond physics and used to develop more general accounts of idealization, modeling, and explanation.
Presenters
CR
Collin Rice
Bryn Mawr College
305 visits

Session Participants

Online
Session speakers, moderators & attendees
Ohio State University
Bryn Mawr College
University of Kentucky
University of Pittsburgh
Lake Forest College
University of Copenhagen
 Martin Zach
Charles University
43 attendees saved this session

Session Chat

Live Chat
Chat with participants attending this session

Questions & Answers

Answered
Submit questions for the presenters

Session Polls

Active
Participate in live polls

Need Help?

Technical Issues?

If you're experiencing playback problems, try adjusting the quality or refreshing the page.

Questions for Speakers?

Use the Q&A tab to submit questions that may be addressed in follow-up sessions.